![]() I would argue that in certain instances they do.Ĭertainly ground conditions can be complex and variable ( volatile) and geotechnical and geophysical results can vary ( ambiguity) which drives up the level of uncertainty leading to mistakes in the characterization of the subsoil and the means and techniques which are employed to deal with it. Source : Harvard Business Review – Feb 2014Ĭan Adverse Physical Conditions fall under VUCA ? Some of those “known unknowns” which plague the industry and are the basis of many claims are listed below. It is therefore paramount to get a good gauge of and make an informed assessment of the likely “known unknowns” ![]() It is for an experienced contractor to fill in the gaps and take an informed decision as to what the likely conditions would be overall.” “Every experienced contractor knows that ground investigations can only be 100% accurate in the precise locations in which they are carried out. In rejecting the claim, Mr Justice Coulson stated : Allseas UK Ltd EWHC 3074 (TCC) which concerned the construction of a Gas Pipeline in the Shetlands one of the claims was for unforeseen ground conditions because certain conditions were different to that suggested in the site investigation at pre-contract stage. It begs the question of what are the “ known unknowns” in terms of marine infrastructure? Certainly the composition of the ground is both a “ known” at the point that it is sampled and a “ unknown” when considering the nature of the ground between sampling points.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |